Rationale and Reference to Research
The outcome is a A5 sketchbook of original grid systems which can be used to create modular typography. The grids are made up of basic geometric shapes which are rotated and layered to form modules. All the grids allow for modular construction in all directions and allow flow between modules. As a result of overlapping the geometric shapes to create the modules this also provides further shapes and more possibilities to create with.The cover design aims to be neutral and appealing to both genders aswell as a range of abilities through the use of colour and minimalist design. The design on the cover was created through layering a module from each of the grids within the book to create a simple design that reflected the content of the sketchbook and placed emphasis on the grids within. The logotype has geometric elements derived from Futura such as a circular ‘O’, whilst uses the uniformity of Helvetica to
reflect a regularity and modular block appearance. Helvetica’s ‘D’ was adapted to better reflect the curvature seen in Futuras ‘O’. The terminals in Helvetica’s ‘S’ were shortened so they curved less and looked more angular. Uppercase letterforms have straighter forms when compared with lowercase so better reflect the blocky, modularity of the grids within the sketchbook.
Grid systems available are restricted to a few, which then have to heavily adapted to create modular type from. Instead the sketchbook aims to bring physical modular experimentation into a compact format.
The outcome aims to increase engagement with experimental the experimental creation of type, through the use of a traditional process. Chen Design Associates agree that designers are more engaged with the process of making when using analogue techniques and that this connection is retained within the work.
The work acts as an alternative to digital tools for modular typography online, such as Fonstruct and updates the familiar format of grids, allowing for a DIY approach to design, aswell as removing the need for expensive materials. This availability of a traditional technique to create typography contrasts Beirut (1994) who suggests that digital tools allow typography to be used and made by anyone, whereas in contrast handmade design needs specialist materials and tools which are not easily accessible.
It was suggested by Odling - Smee that designers have lost an understanding of the basis tools and principles that they are using as graphic designers. The outcome uses a traditional approach to design which improves fundamental skills by increasing understanding of typographic forms, encouraging problems solving through grid restrictions and promoting idea generation through sketching.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.