Consumption the Problem
Issue / Effect
Increased
use of resources and exponential growth
There is a higher demand for limited resources (yellow)
Consumption in wealthy nations has been rapid (yellow)
Increased consumption has played a part in all environmental
concerns (dark green)
Consumption of resources does not rise in line with
population, instead it outstrips it, meaning people are consuming more than is
needed (pink)
More is used than in previous decades (green)
Things are considered resources if they have commercial
value – commercial resources are taken from the Earth quicker than they can
naturally be created meaning resources are low (pink)
Exponential growth makes the problem worse (purple)
Unsustainability
Spreading
Unsustainability is normalised and promoted by Western /
Northern cultures (yellow)
hyperconsumerism from the west spreading around the would
(green text)
Value
of resources
Resources are cheap and considered to have little worth
(brown)
Earth resources have value, of which we are draining
(yellow)
There will be little respect for resources if we continue to
consider resources as valueless until processed industrially (brown)
Natural resources have value originally not just when humans
have processed them (purple)
Sustainable principles view resources as having value in
their raw form (brown)
Intrinsic and Commercial Value
Intrinsic value should be considered an ethic to encourage
more responsible action towards the environment (purple)
A new world view is needed for the intrinsic value of nature
to become an ethic (purple)
It benefits humans to care for the environment – care for
the environment benefits humans – the environment has intrinsic value even when
it cannot be used for human activities (purple)
The way that depletion of ‘natural capital’ has been counted
as income in national accounts symbolizes the way economist’s historically have
treated the environment as valueless (light blue) pg 119
Nature only has value so long as it can be turned into
something economically valuable. Technology can turn many things which were
once economically useless into valuable resources (light blue) pg 119
Disregard
for the environment / Power
Nature is seen as the provider of resources which humans can
use, take and disregard as they please, however there is denial over the
infinite nature of these resources (brown)
Nature provides resources which we take with disregard
(brown)
Society lacks respect for the environments resources (brown)
Society has become detached from nature and is seen as a
thing to be used (neon orange)
Natural capitalism considers the value of natural resources
(dark green)
Greens encourage respect for the Earth and increased ties
with it (purple)
Sustainable development actually marks a break by the
dominant strand of western culture from an idea it has been firmly wedded to
for the past two centuries – faith in progress (neon yellow) pg5
People assumed that advancing science and technology, by
increasing human mastery over nature, would decrease our dependence on it (neon
yellow) pg 5
Faith in human beings capacity to successfully master nature
or even to collectively control our own destiny has been diminished (neon
yellow) pg 5
‘control over nature’ is a phrase conceived in arrogance,
born of the Neanderthal age of biology and philosophy, when it was supposed
that nature exists for the convenience of man (neon yellow) pg 23
The anthropocentric world view that that we are separate
from nature is damaging and needs to be altered to a biocentric / ecocentric
view
Take
lots give little back
Humans are alone in taking so much and giving so little
biological resources back (dark green)
We use more resources than we give back to the environment
(pink)
Nature gives and takes (dark green)
Denial
/ Ignore
Nature is seen as the provider of resources which humans can
use, take and disregard as they please, however there is denial over the
infinite nature of these resources (brown)
Although finite, the great majority of other mainstream raw
materials and the materials … are in sufficient quantities for fears about
their depletion to be minimal (red dot)
Effects
of consumption
There will be social, economic and environmental effects if
we continue using and wasting extreme amounts of resources (brown)
Warnings about environmental breakdown are often talked
about by ecologists (Purple)
Complex
issues causing
Environmental problems are extensive and have complex causes
(dark green)
Waste
90% of materials from the Earth become waste after three
months (pink)
Waste of materials is due to unessecaery durability and
short product use time (pink)
World
giant organism – connected to earth - Interdependence
Every living thing relies on one another in some way (dark
green)
Gaia Principle – the world is a giant organism ( dark green)
We are part of the Cycle of life so have a responsibility
for the planet and the things we create and have to acknowledge that disrupting
the cycle cause problems universally (brown)
Gaia considers every element of the biosphere to have value
(purple)
Nature is an interdependent system with reliance and
equality between beings (purple)
Damage to the environment has an effect on things living on
the planet – Interdependent (purple)
Limits
to Growth
Naturalism shows how there are natural limits to growth
(purple)
Growth may be natural but it does have limits (brown)
Malthus suggested that human growth would have dire
consequences for the Earth (dark green)
George Bastille, when speaking of pressure, states that ……..
critical mass has been accomplished will growth level off’ (Pink)
Rethink on system needed …. System rethink needed because of
natural limits to growth (purple)
Limits to growth = limits to consumption (purple)
Growth needs to be within the limits of the Earth (purple)
Malthus – he argued that the tendency of population towards
geometric growth meant that it would always outstrip growth in food supply
(neon yellow) pg 11
Entrophy sets a limit to the physical scale of the economy (neon
yellow) pg 29
Green view that continuous growth is physically not possible
for the Earth even with technological solutions (purple)
Will
restrict economic growth
Economic growth is restricted by the Earths capacity to
carry, produce and absorb resources (purple)
Limited industrial growth available due to finite resources
(purple)
Less growth would make equality more difficult (neon yellow)
pg 33
Defining
Sustainability
Sustainable means being able to meet the demands of both now
and the future (neon yellow)
Sustainable design considers the economic, social and environmental
impacts of design equal (yellow)
Equity between generations and equity within generations
(neon yellow)
Sustainability to ecologists means ensuring natural
resources from natural processes continue into the future rather than just
human processed materials (purple)
Debate about sustainability could be defined as the ideas
that emerge when concern for the global environment and concern for global
social justice meet (neon yellow) pg 33
Sustainable
development
Concept of sustainable development was the aim to integrate
environment al considerations into economic policy (light blue) pg 38
Balance environmental concern with endorsement of economic
growth (light blue) pg 38
Conflicting
ideas of sustainability – vague
Sustainability and sustainable development are general terms
with multiple meanings (purple)
Sustainability as a term is not useful because it can be
applied widely, it is too vague (pink)
Defining green can be difficult and can have different
definitions (brown)
O’Riordan expressed the concern that the vagueness of the
definition would allow people to claim almost anything as part of ‘sustainable
development’, reducing the term to meaninglessness (light blue)
Conflicting
Business and Environmental sustainability
Sustainable development form some focusses on economics, whilst
for others, focuses on the environment (neon yellow)
We are accustomed to thinking industry and the environment
as being ……it is considered that industry and the environment are in contrast
(dark green)
Severe tensions between the utilitarian basis of mainstream
economics and sustainabilitys concern for equity within and between generations
(neon yellow) pg4
Business
Business relies on growth to continue (dark green)
No growth for business is negative (dark green)
People considered environmental approaches to be separate
from economics or even damaging to profit (dark green)
Focus on increased consumption in developed countries for economic
growth (yellow)
Economists have concerns that sustainable development could
lead to reduced growth due to environmental concerns (neon yellow)
Slowing of resource use goes against growth economics
(yellow)
GNP as
a measure of health
GNP does not consider the environment (purple)
Greens have a negative view of GNP to measure the economy
(purple)
There is wariness of measuring an economy through GNP
because it does not consider the sustainability of the system (purple)
It does not consider the whether production processes are
sustainable (purple)
Calculations og Gross National Product (GNP) were seriously
misleading as a measure of human welfare because they included the cost of
defensive measures such as anti pollution expenditure and failed to count
negative effects of affluence like aircraft niose against growth (neon yellow)
pg 25
‘The GDP takes only one measure of progress into account:
activity. Economic activity’ – GDP only considers economic progress to be
progress – GDP only considers increased productivity to be progress (dark
green)
This idea of progress was formulated when our perception of
resources and quality of life were different (dark green)
A place can be economically successful however other factors
can be failing (dark green)
Economics is considered first, with the environment and
human health sidelined (dark green)
In calculating GNP statistics, economists treat the
consumption of the Earths capital as if it were income (light blue) pg 81
Cannot
coexist
Conflicting needs between nature and industry suggest both
systems cannot coexist (dark green)
Can sustainability and business work together? (light blue)
Sustainable and industrial design not compatible (light
blue)
It appears that these two systems cannot thrive in the same
world – they cannot coincide (dark green)
Business
dominant
The economy is usually focussed upon with the other
sidelined and considered after (dark green)
But in the race for economic progress, social activity,
ecological impact, cultural activity, and long term effect can be overlooked –
focus on economic progress leads to other aspects being forgotten (dark green)
Can work together
Brundtland report suggested through sustainable development
both the environment and economy could be protected (neon yellow)
Both business and the environment can both work well
together (dark blue)
Sustainable design can have positive implications for
consumption and the environment (dark green)
Need other ways of measuring sustainability (neon orange)
Sustainability needed
Sustainability needs to be considered for both the
environment and economy (neon orange)
Sustainability
/ sustainable development - vague -
disagreement
Definition that was at the very least rather vague (light
blue) pg 39
Beyond
limits
Humans are the same as other species, however we have
expanded beyond our natural boundaries (brown)
Actions
affect wider world and impacting us
Everything made and produced has an impact on the
environment (Neon Orange)
Environmental impact are having an effect on various aspects
of our lives. Sustainability is being perceived more in terms of economic s .
Environmental impacts are now seen as a problem as they are having visible
effects on ecology, economy, health and wellbeing (neon orange)
Our impacts on the environment call into question the
sustainability of life on the planet (Brown)
Our industrial system is a small part of the wider natural
system, meaning any impact on natural resources has a negative effect on the
economy (brown)
The effects of increased industrialisation and population
growth affect the whole world (neon pink)
Historical
context
Industrialists considered resources to be infinite (dark
green)
‘Resources seemed immeasurably vast. Nature itself ……
natural resources were considered infinite during the industrial revolution
(dark green)
Historically we have considered the environment to have
infinite resources and viewed ourselves as superior to the environment, this
viewpoint has continued into modern thinking (brown)
We have become detached from the Earth because of
industrialism (purple)
Themes that are debatable today around the issue of the
environment would be recognisable to a Victorian intellect (neon yellow) pg 19
Modern industries still operate according to paradigms that
developed when humans had a very different sense of the world – manufacturing
today still relies on this sytem despite understanding the world in a different
way (dark green)
The Industrial Revolution allowed humans power over nature,
however this has disconnected us with the environment (dark green)
Pass on
to future
Generations after us should not have to bare the
consequences of design in the past (dark
green)
Environmental damage from consumption could be what we pass
onto future genrations (pink)
‘Poor design on such a scale reaches far beyond our own life
span. It perpetrates what we call intergenerational remote tyranny – our
tyranny over future generations through the effects of our actions today’ – our
industrial and design system will have effects on future generations not just
our own
Finite
resources
Although finite, the
great majority of other mainstream raw materials and the materials made from
them …… are available in sufficient quantities for fears about their depletion
to be minimal (red dot)
Earth has finite resources (purple)
Resources are limited but we use them as if they are endless
(brown)
We now need to understand that resources used to create
products are not endless (red)
A finite resource system means shortages of resources are a
certainty which will eventually increase prices (purple)
The planet has been able to put up with a level of
industrialism and consumerism, however change is needed as resources are finite
(green)
‘natural resources’ are infinite or infinitely substitutable
– be able to find a substitution because of technical progress (light blue) pg
122
Consumption
unsustainable / failure to be sustainable / exponential growth
Current production and consumption unsustainable in numerous
ways (light blue)
Huge use of resources shows how industrial countries have
failed to be sustainable (yellow)
Exponential growth within system unsustainable (purple)
Growth predictions unsustainable (purple)
Consumption is currently unsustainable and the complete
solution is not clear (yellow)
Rise of
living standards quantify problem
Increase in living standards worldwide will increase problem
(yellow)
More strain put on environment by newly emerging economies
(yellow)
It is not possible for all countries to have the same living
standards as rich countries (purple)
Suggestions of universal consumption reduction is not
necessary because consumption levels are not the same universally (Purple)
Rethink
on consumption levels
To be sustainable citizens we have to think about our
consumption (yellow)
Reassess material consumption (light blue)
Understood politically and academically that consumption
needs to be reduced (yellow)
There needs to be a rethink on how we extract / get
materials (red)
It is not plausible for society to continue thinking they
can grow and consume (purple)
Rethink on system needed …. System rethink needed because of
natural limits to growth (purple)
Churn needs to be reduced to help the environment but this
argument is mixed with anti – capitalist tones (green type)
For a sustainable society to be achieved, consumption in
industrial countries needs to be reduced and increased economic growth does not
effectively meet human needs (purple)
Design
the problem?
There is a link between how things are designed and used and
the environmental problems that are faced – Design is in numerous ways the
cause of environmental problems (brown)
Enlightenment
link with Industrial Revolution Context
Enlightenment places humans centrally in relation to the
rest of the world and living things as well as the universe (purple)
Enlightenment is the belief that the world was created for
humans, meaning nothing should be hidden from them (purple)
This world view remained dominant but allowed green ideology
to form in reaction to this (purple)
Western science that allowed human beings to break free of
the technological limits which had constrained earlier civilisations, leading
to the emergent belief in progress (neon yellow) pg 7
The technology and social organization that flowed out of
the Industrial Revolution gave human beings a degree of control over nature
unparalleled in previous history (neon yellow) pg 11
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.